What Works for Home Visiting Programs: Lessons from Experimental Evaluations of Programs and Interventions

Following rigorous evaluations of 66 home visitation programs, researchers found that less than half positively affected their communities, this fact sheet says.

All programs were evaluated and categorized based on their impacts in 10 “outcome areas”: physical health and development, cognitive development, externalizing behavior, social skills, mental health, reproductive health, substance use, child maltreatment, parent-child relationships and parenting skills. Only 32 of the 66 were placed in a category describing programs with “positive or significant” impacts on at least one of the 10 items.

The study found that there is no one setting or method that works across age groups. Rather, to be successful, visitation programs must take separate approaches for early childhood, preschool-age, middle childhood and adolescent programs.

Programs that serve the younger groups – preschool-aged and early childhood – required more intense approaches. The study found that programs that involved four or more visits per month were most effective, compared with long-term programs with one or fewer visits per month. The latter did not yield positive results in any of the categories. Using trained non-professionals as visitors proved to be an effective technique in about half of the programs for each age level, the report says.

Examples of several home visitation programs can be found here.

Free, 33 pages.


Youth Today is the only independent, internationally distributed digital media publication that is read by thousands of professionals in the youth service field.

Youth Today adheres to high-quality journalistic standards, providing readers with professional news coverage dedicated to examining a wide spectrum of complex issues in the youth services industry from legislation to community-based youth work.


Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue.


We are committed to transparency in every aspect of funding our organization. Donors may be quoted, mentioned or featured in our stories. Our news judgments are made independently – not based on or influenced by donors. Accepting financial support does not mean we endorse donors or their products, services or opinions…(read more)

Recent Comments




Kennesaw State University Mountain Logo & Ceneter for Sustainable Journalism Logo
LOGO Institute for Nonprofit News 3 turquoise boxes stacked in "J" shape

Copyright © 2018 Youth Today and MVP Themes --- Published by Center for Sustainable Journalism,
Kennesaw State University, 1200 Chastain Blvd. Suite 310, Kennesaw GA 30144

To Top