Research

Making Sense of Mixed Findings About Mentoring

Review of Three Recent Randomized Trials of School-Based Mentoring: Making Sense of Mixed Findings 

Society for Research in Child Development

This report, the results of which were discussed at a MENTOR news conference in Washington on Thursday, seeks to clarify the findings of a recent analysis of three school-based mentoring programs.    

Data collected through the evaluation of Big Brothers Big Sisters of America (BBBSA) affiliates, Communities in Schools of San Antonio, Texas, and grant recipients of the U.S. Department of Education’s Student Mentoring Program have led to contradictory policy decisions. Numbers collected from BBBSA led that organization to create a new mentoring pilot program, while the findings of the same report were cited as a reason to eliminate the Student Mentoring Program in the federal budget.

The authors of this most recent study suggest that differences in programming and methods used for statistical analyses resulted in mixed information. Data acquired from BBBSA suggested that youth who were paired with “Bigs” (mentors) experienced an improvement in both their academic performance and their attitudes, whereas results from the Department of Education’s program seemed to show that school-based mentoring had little social or scholarly impact on youth. The analysis of the CIS-SA program fell in between the two extremes.

School-based programs represent one in four of the more than 4,000 programs listed in a national mentoring database, according to the study. Although all share the structure of a school environment, the makeup and support systems within each organization varies. In their own evaluation of the earlier studies, the authors describe the differences inherent in program design and data collection techniques used when assessing the success of the organizations. They conclude that school-based mentoring programs are most effective in reducing certain social problems, such as truancy and “school-related misconduct,” and increasing student engagement in the classroom, but may have a lesser impact on scholastic achievement.

Free, 27 pages. http://www.srcd.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=232&Itemid=550


Comments

Youth Today is the only independent, internationally distributed digital media publication that is read by thousands of professionals in the youth service field.

Youth Today adheres to high-quality journalistic standards, providing readers with professional news coverage dedicated to examining a wide spectrum of complex issues in the youth services industry from legislation to community-based youth work.

EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE

Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue.

DONORS & DONOR TRANSPARENCY

We are committed to transparency in every aspect of funding our organization. Donors may be quoted, mentioned or featured in our stories. Our news judgments are made independently – not based on or influenced by donors. Accepting financial support does not mean we endorse donors or their products, services or opinions…(read more)

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Search

Kennesaw State University Mountain Logo & Ceneter for Sustainable Journalism Logo
LOGO Institute for Nonprofit News 3 turquoise boxes stacked in "J" shape

Copyright © 2018 Youth Today and MVP Themes --- Published by Center for Sustainable Journalism,
Kennesaw State University, 1200 Chastain Blvd. Suite 310, Kennesaw GA 30144

To Top