Combine Community Schools with Expanding Learning Time to Help Disadvantaged Youth

Breaking the Mold: Combining Community Schools with Expanded Learning Time to Help Educationally Disadvantaged Students

Center for American Progress


Students who are struggling academically may benefit from participation in two types of programs that restructure the classroom experience, according to this study. It says that two reform models – one based on the development of a community school that would provide a wide array of support services, the other focused on an increase in time allotted for academic and enrichment activities – have been successfully implemented in hundreds of schools across the country, but few have attempted to develop and integrate the programs simultaneously.

Both models attempt to redefine the rigidity of a traditional school environment, targeting “educationally disadvantaged students” who live in “disproportionately low or lower middle-income communities,” where a variety of factors may limit their academic achievement.

The study outlines the benefits of mixing the models, by examining three elementary and middle schools (two in Chicago and one in Camden, N.J.) that have done so. Community schools provide services aimed at supporting the physical, mental and social needs of students and families. The model includes at least one partnership with a community organization, ranging from a nonprofit to a private business. The expanding learning plan focuses on the restructuring of the academic day, week or year to include more time for teaching, extracurricular pursuits and staff development.

At Burroughs Elementary School in Chicago, for example, the school day was expanded by one  hour, which the authors cite to explain the school’s “impressive” test scores. While 93.7 percent of the students are low-income, its 2008-2009 test scores were higher than both the state and district averages. Another Chicago school, Marquette Elementary, similarly expanded its school day and developed a variety of community-based services, including a new health center. The combined model gives students more time to learn and focus more on classes, as other, non-academic needs are met.

A lack of funding serves as the biggest obstacle to the success of a combined program. The authors recommend more federal funding, and greater state and local government involvement in the development of the initiatives.

Free, 44 pages,


Youth Today is the only independent, internationally distributed digital media publication that is read by thousands of professionals in the youth service field.

Youth Today adheres to high-quality journalistic standards, providing readers with professional news coverage dedicated to examining a wide spectrum of complex issues in the youth services industry from legislation to community-based youth work.


Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue.


We are committed to transparency in every aspect of funding our organization. Donors may be quoted, mentioned or featured in our stories. Our news judgments are made independently – not based on or influenced by donors. Accepting financial support does not mean we endorse donors or their products, services or opinions…(read more)



Recent Comments

Kennesaw State University Mountain Logo & Ceneter for Sustainable Journalism Logo
LOGO Institute for Nonprofit News 3 turquoise boxes stacked in "J" shape

Copyright © 2018 Youth Today and MVP Themes --- Published by Center for Sustainable Journalism,
Kennesaw State University, 1200 Chastain Blvd. Suite 310, Kennesaw GA 30144

To Top