American Federation of Teachers Head Criticizes DeVos, Calls for Commitment to Public Schools

Print More

Molly McCluskey

WASHINGTON — American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten opposed the confirmation of Betsy DeVos as secretary of education, calling for a renewed commitment to, and investment in, public schools in a press conference at the National Press Club.

“I believe that whether one wants a less polarized environment, or a skilled workforce and more middle-class jobs, or pluralism and democracy, or diversity and tolerance, or just for children to thrive and be joyful, the answer always starts with a powerful, purposeful, public education,” Weingarten said Monday.

Speaking to standing-room-only audience, Weingarten excoriated President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for secretary of the Department of Education, Republican fundraiser Betsy DeVos. Her confirmation hearing, originally set for Wednesday by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, has been delayed till Jan. 17. Democratic leaders had called for the hearing to be delayed until DeVos’ background investigation is completed, and she is fully screened for financial and ethical conflicts of interest.

Weingarten’s largest concern was that, given what she called DeVos’ anti-public school stance, the confirmation would undermine the Every Student Succeeds Act, which Weingarten credits with “ending the education wars.”

“ESSA quelled the education wars and enabled our shared attention to return to what works: collaboration, capacity building, powerful learning and the well-being of all children,” Weingarten said. “These are practical concepts that are scalable and sustainable, that Republicans and Democrats can support, and that red state and blue states, rural, suburban and urban schools can implement with the right investment and management.”

Weingarten called DeVos “the most anti-public education nominee for secretary of education in the history of the department,” owing to the fact that neither DeVos nor her children attended public schools, and DeVos has no experience in teaching or education policy.

On her website, DeVos calls herself  “an innovator, a disruptor and an advocate” for education.

“Disruption may be in vogue in business schools, but disrupting, rather than fixing struggling schools has come to mean mass firings, school closures and district or state takeovers,” Weingarten said.

DeVos is prevented from giving media interviews during the Senate confirmation process. However, Greg McNeilly, chief operating officer for the Windquest Group, the investment firm DeVos founded with her husband, responded via email to a request for comment on DeVos’ behalf, calling himself “long-time DeVos aide,” with the following statement:

“Betsy believes in a diversity of experiences and in supporting all of America’s students, regardless what label you put on their schools. America has so many hard-working teachers we need to support every high-quality learning opportunity for children and the good teachers in each classroom.”

Jeanne Allen, founder and chief executive officer of the Center for Education Reform, called Weingarten’s speech a “partisan rant by the leader of the first national union to endorse the Democratic nominee in the last election, and they lost.”

“For the head of an organization that purports to represent teachers by attempting to create fear among them is outrageous and contradictory,” Allen wrote in a statement. “[Weingarten] claims that an agenda that promotes school options is anti-public education. The only thing anti-public education is those who oppose educating the public in any way that best suits the needs of its students.”

Should DeVos be confirmed, Weingarten issued this invitation: “Spend some time in our schools. There is no substitute for seeing firsthand what works so well in our public schools or for seeing the indefensible conditions that too many students, teachers, and staff endure.”

This story has been updated.

  • Frank Russell

    Do Americans really embrace “group think”?

    There’s no understanding these progressive tools. They are violent, foul-mouthed and behave as spoiled children. Some obvious examples are the so-called protester who shouted “Shame!” over and over at Betsy DeVos. Shame over what? What decisions in her position as Secretary of Education has she made that she should be shameful for? They won’t even allow these folks to do their job, they’re “proactive protesters” who apparently know the future. Absolutely stupefying.

    Then we have the “By Any Means Necessary” folks and their criminal spokesperson, Yvette Felarca, who openly assault those who disagree with their viewpoints. She assaulted a man in Berkeley that resulted in him laying in the street taking boot stomps to his body. And she defended these tactics in a recent interview on Fox News. I encourage anyone who is unaware of this protesting variant to Google “Yvette Felarca Tucker Carlson” to find and watch her interview.

    These people are laying waste to the Democratic Party and sending common sense minded Democrats to the Republican Party! Check the story on the New York Post about gay New York journalist Chadwick Moore who left the close-minded Democratic Party because of the nature of progressive liberalism. He couldn’t accept the fact that they shout down anyone who doesn’t strictly apply to the dimensions of their narrow minded viewpoints. That, and they’re violent and obnoxious!

    The Democratic Party, liberal media and liberal businesses are afraid of these people. They don’t challenge them for fear tha they’ll end up in their ire. It’s ironic that people who claim to be “inclusive” are only so if those participants strictly believe the ideology that bubbles up in the Kool-Aid they serve. If the Democrats don’t get ahold of this situation, their party could be laid to waste through the next few elections, at least. It’s an embarrassing time to be a Democrat.

    God Bless America.