Opinion

Residential Centers Can Be Ideal

John Kelly’s article “Child Welfare’s Historic Headache” [May] states, “Yes, residential centers are overused in child welfare.”

Why is this stated as a fact, rather than as an opinion? What are the specific thresholds for the use of residential centers? Which “residential centers” – group homes, residential treatment centers, residential education centers, emergency shelters – are being addressed in this statement?

Has there been research that proves traditional foster care is better for children, especially older children, than larger residential settings? Should there be such thresholds, or is it better to look at the children who need a safe, nurturing, education-focused setting and consider what is in each child’s best interest?

In fact, in Kelly’s article, a Texas Child Protective Services spokesman suggests, “It would be disruptive to drop the youths into traditional schools and foster homes. We want to keep them in groups and, wherever we can, keep siblings together.”

Here it seems that residential settings – which provide children the opportunity to live with their siblings in single-family homes with a married houseparent couple and 6 to 10 children – are the most appropriate setting for these children. For some, residential education settings are the ideal situation: a safe, stable, family-like environment where siblings can remain together.

The blanket statement that residential centers are overused in child welfare is based on bias, not research. The range of options, including high-quality residential programs, for children needing out-of-home care needs to be broadened, not narrowed, as affirmed by Public Law 109-288, passed in 2006.

Heidi Goldsmith, Executive Director
Coalition for Residential Education
Silver Spring, Md.

 

Comments

Youth Today is the only independent, internationally distributed digital media publication that is read by thousands of professionals in the youth service field.

Youth Today adheres to high-quality journalistic standards, providing readers with professional news coverage dedicated to examining a wide spectrum of complex issues in the youth services industry from legislation to community-based youth work.

EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE

Our organization retains full authority over editorial content to protect the best journalistic and business interests of our organization. We maintain a firewall between news coverage decisions and sources of all revenue.

DONORS & DONOR TRANSPARENCY

We are committed to transparency in every aspect of funding our organization. Donors may be quoted, mentioned or featured in our stories. Our news judgments are made independently – not based on or influenced by donors. Accepting financial support does not mean we endorse donors or their products, services or opinions…(read more)

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Kennesaw State University Mountain Logo & Ceneter for Sustainable Journalism Logo
LOGO Institute for Nonprofit News 3 turquoise boxes stacked in "J" shape

Copyright © 2018 Youth Today and MVP Themes --- Published by Center for Sustainable Journalism,
Kennesaw State University, 1200 Chastain Blvd. Suite 310, Kennesaw GA 30144

To Top