Confessions of a Caseworker: We Remove Kids to Protect Ourselves

Print More

richard wexlerIt’s hard to imagine many jobs more difficult than that of a caseworker for a child protective services agency. The hours are long, the pay is low, the stress is high and the stakes can be, literally, life and death. Most workers have the best of intentions.

But one of the things caseworkers often say is just not true. Caseworkers often claim they are “damned if we do and we’re damned if we don’t.” But when it comes to taking away children, caseworkers are only damned if they don’t. It’s one of the reasons so many children are needlessly consigned to the chaos of foster care.

Now, a leader of a union representing caseworkers has admitted as much.

It happened last June when a committee of the Philadelphia City Council examined problems at the Department of Human Services, the agency that runs child welfare in the city. Among the issues: the fact that Philadelphia takes away children at one of the highest rates of any big city.

That was true even before the legislature passed a spate of new state laws in the wake of the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal. The laws encourage anyone and everyone to report anything and everything to the state child abuse hotline. Reports have skyrocketed and, in much of the state, so have removals.

Usually at hearings such as the one in Philadelphia, caseworkers and agency chiefs offer up bland boilerplate about how they really, truly hate to take away children and only do it as a last resort — almost always adding that they’re “damned if we do and damned if we don’t.”

But this time Vanessa Fields, vice president of District Council 47 of the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, cut right through all that b.s. With commendable candor, she declared:

“Workers are afraid that they're going to be disciplined if anything goes wrong on a case. So their thing is, Well, I'm just going to take the kid out of the home and put them in care. That way, I don't have to worry about being written up or disciplined because I left the children in the home and something happened to them. … You place that kid outside of that home, because you do not want to be in a situation where you left a child in a home and something happened to them.”

But what about all those case practice models, risk assessment forms and assorted other documents that are supposed to guide how caseworkers do their jobs? Apparently, those are for suckers. Said Fields:

[Related: It’s Called Social Work, Not Women’s Work]

“People aren't paying any attention to that guidance thing, the format that you use on the hotline. They're not paying attention to that or those other forms. Their thing is, I want to have a job. Okay?”

As interesting as what Fields said is what she did not say. She expressed no fear of discipline for taking away too many children. Nor should she. In 40 years of following child welfare I have never seen a caseworker fired, demoted, suspended or even slapped on the wrist for that.

On the rare occasion when a family harmed this way brings a civil suit, caseworkers have “qualified immunity.” In layman’s terms that means they’re immune from damages unless they do something incredibly malicious or incredibly stupid. In one case, a worker actually claimed what amounted to a constitutional right to lie. Fortunately, that claim failed, but the worker in question wasn’t fired. She was promoted.

Fields also did not offer up that all-purpose excuse: “We don’t remove children on our own. The courts have to approve everything we do.” In fact, in every state caseworkers and/or law enforcement take away children on their own whenever they decide the case is an “emergency.” Parents have to fight to get their children back days or weeks later. Judges almost always rubber-stamp these removals.

Again, to her great credit, Fields does not pretend otherwise. She repeatedly refers to workers, acting on their own authority, removing children in order to protect themselves, not the children.

It’s not easy to fix this. Fields complained about the fact that in one particularly horrific case, workers were criminally prosecuted and one went to jail. But in that case, workers were convicted of repeatedly failing to visit the child and then engaging in massive falsification of records to cover it up. On very rare occasions criminal charges are warranted.

The problem is the lack of penalty for wrongful removal. The solution to that is something almost never seen in child welfare agencies: strong leadership. Child welfare agency leaders need to send a message: If you make an honest error we will support you. If media try to scapegoat you for tragedies beyond your control we’ll have your back. But if your negligence or incompetence causes errors in any direction — whether it’s leaving a child in a dangerous home or taking a child needlessly — you will be accountable.

It can be done. Pittsburgh is subject to those same post-Sandusky laws as Philadelphia. But there’s been no increase in foster care in Pittsburgh. Because in Pittsburgh, they won’t permit it.

Richard Wexler is executive director of the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform, www.nccpr.org

More related articles:

All I Really Need to Know About Social Work I Learned in Clubhouse

So You Think You Want to Be a Social Worker

Self-Care: You Can’t Do It Alone, Professionals Say

  • Piece2016

    We appreciated Social Workers coming out and exposing the abuses of CPS. This has got to stop. Thousands of children murdered in State Care per year across this country, thousands more children missing, thousands molested, raped, starved, beaten, emotionally, physically, mentally severely abused by Social Workers, Foster Homes etc… National Journal of Medicine shows that removing a child from safe homes causes so much trauma it causes the children Neurological Brain Damage, Then physch. meds, not to mention the hell parents are put through. Follow your policies, procedures, don’t lie, read the Constitution, Parents Family rights, Civil Right.. People say that CPS is a child trafficking and pedophile ring. I think they are right… What have you Social Workers done?

    • LeAnn Addleman

      It’s pretty easy to prove that CPS is heavily involved in the child sex trade, pedophilia, child porn and smut films where babies and children of all ages are murdered on camera. There should be no misunderstanding why the business (and it is a business, just to bring in the “Almighty Dollar”) has such a huge turnover rate. Who in their right mind would want to be associated with an “agency” that does so much harm?

  • jusbecuz

    One my favorite articles that shares that same thing. Read the last paragraph. http://action4cp.org/documents/2009/pdf/April_Why_We_Remove_Kids.pdf

    • LeAnn Addleman

      Because their policies and reasons for removal seem to be up to individual interpretation, this could mean that all children must be removed in case something terrible might happen to the child. A good read is A Brave New World. We are now entering into the Twilight Zone.

  • Our Eclubs

    You must be careful not to lump ALL CPS SOCIAL WORKER into this cauldron. Some of them do care and work very hard to get it right.

    • Richard Wexler

      I agree. In fact, I believe the worker who made the comments I quoted is one of the many workers who care and work hard to get it right. The main problem is lack of leadership from their bosses at CPS agencies, and from the politicians who decide if the heads of those agencies will keep their jobs.

    • Jennifer R.

      Yes, just as there are good politicians and good cops – but they stay silent when their peers do wrong, so are they really good?

      • LeAnn Addleman

        Good point Jennifer R. It’s sad that in order to protect your job, family, and life you have to keep your mouth shut about what you see and hear and know.

    • Karen Riley

      If they really cared, they would tell the authorities that other workers are committing crimes against families; falsifying documents, paying therapists and doctors to intentionally misdiagnose people with mental illnesses they don’t have, making false allegations against families, etc…and not work in a facility or an agency that supports and teaches that. I took the foster training course, have their manual, and Social Services teaches their new employees how to fault families in order to remove their children. Some may go in with good intentions, but they can’t claim that to be the case if they are participating in wronging families to take their kids. If you were a police officer, went in with good intentions of protecting the innocent and upholding the law, and your superior told you that at your next drug bust you were to confiscate the drugs, let the offenders go and bring the drugs back so he could sell them to the college kids in the next town and you comply with that, you would be just as guilty as your superior and anyone else involved.

  • Lisa Myles

    I appreciate the social worker and judge for getting my grandkids in my care, and pray it stays that way for their safety, some do the right thing and I Truly Thank them right in Shreveport, Louisiana.

  • Karen Riley
  • RTMartin

    America! …. It’s called a violation of your human rights.

    NOBODY has any rights to take another person’s FAMILY…. NOBODY!

    They’re LYING to you.

    Foster Care is established by sadists with the intention of exposing innocent children to their diabolical agendas such as medical and sexual abuse through foster care.

    Foster Care is a one-stop-shop for sadistic perverts.

    Hold EVERY ONE of these sadistic perverts accountable for their crimes against humanity.

    Accountability and Justice: END Medical Abuse and Foster Care Corruption.

    …. For the BETTERMENT of humanity.

  • James Rinkevich

    CPS workers do not have qualified immunity for all their actions. They only have QI for actions taken legally and within their discretion. Most takings aren’t done with a warrant nor in an emergency that allows discretion. And even when they get warrants, the warrants aren’t for takings that would meet the best interest of the child (see NCCPR’s paper “The Evidence Is in”) and thus actually in violation of the law. It is just that enough people haven’t sued them for civil rights violations, that every agency will still pay all the workers indemnities. Even in cases where every worker lied, nobody gets fired, demoted, suspended, or even retrained. That means any worker can lie for the agency without any action taken against her/him. Only if they lie about their work against the agency interest (or testify against truthfully) are they ever disciplined.