Not a Subscriber? Register Now
The View from the CliffFebruary 01, 2012 by John Kelly
For nonprofits that rely primarily on philanthropic support, membership or user fees, says the Bridgespan report, overall economic recovery is a light at the end of their collective tunnel. For nonprofits primed mostly by government fees for service, the tunnel leads to a cliff they are about to fall off.
It is a drastic and dire forecast based largely on one major premise: continuance of cuts to domestic spending on the federal level.
“Given that roughly a quarter of state government funding and a third of local government funding comes from Washington, D.C., the federal budget squeeze in turn will impinge on human services budgets at those levels,” said the report, which was penned by Daniel Stid and Vishal Shah.
Federal domestic appropriations have declined for years, although funds for some major youth-related programs and services have been protected. That has not taken the toll it would have on state and local spending decisions, Bridgespan points out, because the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act infused additional stimulus funds into state budgets.
The 2012 budget cycle is the first since 2009 in which few states will have ARRA funds around to spend. And because the “Super Committee” set up by the Budget Control Act failed to approve a 10-year plan for spending, the “grinding down is about accelerate,” the report said. The lack of a plan from the committee triggered automatic cuts in 2013, and forces about $1 trillion in domestic spending cuts over the next decade.
In addition to budget research, Bridgespan surveyed leaders from 68 nonprofits that receive the majority of their funding from government sources, and also interviewed fiscal experts at the state and local level.
“Most of the nonprofits we spoke with have managed to survive the tough economic times with their government funding intact, floating in large part on a bubble created by federal stimulus funds,” the report said. “But the bubble is set to burst, and the cliff is just ahead. Nonprofits are deeply concerned about the coming government funding squeeze and appear to have only limited options available as they look ahead to tougher times.”
Bridgespan identified a number of ways that these 68 organizations were “belt-tightening” during hard times, but also pointed out that many of those measures work on the faith that funding levels will be restored one day.
One former state government financial officer told Bridgespan, “The real question nonprofit leaders should be asking themselves is, ‘how can I adjust our operating model to get to a fundamentally new cost position?’”
Some leaders interviewed for the report suggested that broad, “haircut” approaches to budget cuts in human services should give way to the less politically palatable idea of focusing resources on high-impact programs and providers.
“It’s hard to be the bad guy and say ‘we had 10 grantees and now we are going to only have eight,’” one nonprofit chief financial officer told Bridgespan. “It is comparatively easier to say ‘we had 10, will continue to have 10, but we need to give everyone a haircut.’”
Click here to read the report.
You must Login before leaving a comment.
Report Roundup Articles
Nickolas Bagley | 12/06/13National Standards for the Care of Youth Charged w... Read More
Nickolas Bagley | 12/04/13Youth Civic Development & Education... Read More
Nickolas Bagley | 11/26/13Key Findings: Trends in the Parent-Report of Healt... Read More
Nickolas Bagley | 11/20/13Has Education Paid Off for Black Workers?... Read More
Nickolas Bagley | 11/20/13The First Eight Years: Giving Kids a Foundation fo... Read More
Nickolas Bagley | 11/20/13The Nation's Report Card: U.S. States in a Global ... Read More
Nickolas Bagley | 11/19/13Something to Say: Success Principles for Afterscho... Read More
Nickolas Bagley | 11/12/13Sports-Related Concussions in Youth: Improving the... Read More
Latest Tweets From Youth Today
Moving from the Traditional Idea of Punishment to a More Measured Response
Written by John Lash | 12/06/2013
One of the most entrenched ideas in American culture is that punishment is effective both at creating justice and at affecting change in those who do wrong. The basic concept is that when someone does something I don’t like I hurt them, or threaten to hurt them, and they change. Obviously this kind of violence does work, but it is limited by my ability and willingness to harm you.
We see this idea demonstrated in everything from child rearing to war. We also see it played out in the realm of juvenile justice policy. In the ‘90s it was the impetus for many of the changes to juvenile codes that made it easier to transfer kid...
Report Urges Ban on Detaining Status Offenders
Gary Gately | 12/05/2013 | Full Article
San Jose Charter School Helps Salvage Lives
By Sharon Noguchi / San Jose Mercury News
| 12/05/2013 | Full Article
Nation's Largest School Police Force, in L.A., Will Stop Ticketing Kids 12 and Younger
Susan Ferriss | 11/27/2013 | Full Article